Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts

Sunday, June 29, 2008

The OZ connection

The software is finally (well...) done. I mean it is totally functional, does what it is supposed to be and it is absolutely beautiful to look at. The design is old-school, meaning lean, efficient and therefore aesthetically perfect on my book. Thanks to Philip for never being satisfied. In fact every day there is some internal change that makes it run faster or adds even more functionality.

I will provide pictures of the UI in full operation as it grabs puppet positions, controls lights, sounds etc. It feels a bit like those old music sequencers which were so intuitive and logical and therefore easy to use, yet produced any result that your imagination demanded. This is the case.

These are some current pics of the UI before anything is loaded. The puppet figure is just a place holder until the cameras, both for tracking and for position display are connected.



This last shot shows the tracking grid. All the application is done modularly so that everything can be customized, such as the resolution of the grid which in this case represents the size of the stage, basically 6x8 meters. Every cell triggers different responses from the Creator based on the performer actions and timing.

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Out of Sight

A few more days and we will be driving up the east coast to NY. I hate to think of all the gas we will burn, but I am sure it will be less than taking a plane, no to mention the cost. Nowadays it is impossible (and this is good) to do anything without minding the consequences in the bigger picture of life as we know it. I feel that finally a swell of inconformity is rising against the many tyrants that rule our world, including our inner one.

Back to business. The weight of the eyes proved too much for the tiny springs, so I decided to encase the spring inside a sturdier one and on top of that I put a couple of coats of latex to hold it together and still be flexible. That proved an overkill. The eyes became too stiff and did not respond to the movement as expected. So I carved them from an ultralight foam, and gave the a few coats of liquid gesso. After sanding them they had just the right look and weight to be supported by the tiny springs.

On the left the amputated wooden eye vs. the light foam eyeballs shown at the end of the spring. The toothpick became the optic nerve and it is passively string-controlled for the basic position and orientation of the eyes. They work beautifully and add a lot of expressiveness. The strings are connected to the end of the neck, so that when the Creator bows its head or kneels, the eyes "relax", and when he stands up they perk up very nicely. As everything puppetry and theatrical, their exaggerated irritation is understandable, given the great effort to see and make sense of an utterly absurd world.

The focal point of the entire universe of the Creator is ultimately its creature. Regardless of the external appearance, which only a parent would love, the important thing is that which radiates from it and communicates its presence. This electronic soul is extremely simple yet fascinating. We started creating the tracking beacon using standard IR (infrared) LED's. We were having problems achieving the necessary brightness to be detected at a long distance. On top of that, since the creature moves around the stage wildly shaking every part of its body and sometimes lowering its head it was important that the beacon be visible in all circumstances. Adding the half-pong ball (sanded to paper thin) helped the angle spread of the light but we thought that it would cut the light considerably.

And indeed our first tests confirmed that. So we bought the super-wide angle IR LED's in the hope of solving the angle problem and still retaining the strength of the light. (see the previous post on that here)


Now comes the ignoramus part, which if we had done a little more research would have been avoided. All the webcams we tested have an internal filter that blocks IR, not exactly sure why (have not had a minute to explore that). So we proceeded to dismantle the lenses to remove such filters. (unfortunately we were so engrossed in doing so that I forgot to take pictures of the process!) This tested every sense and the steadiness of our hands, not to mention memorizing the order and orientation of every microlens. In fact, in the case of our wide-angle camera shown previously, after removing the IR blocker, we had to rearrange all 9 lenses and spacers in any imaginable way until we hit on the right one. Philip which has much better eyesight ended doing the final assemblies and it was nerve wracking to watch, almost like a brain surgeon removing a micro tumor.

The original beacon, which we will use as a backup since it is even brighter because it has more LED's to begin with.

Well, then we were up for a big surprise, in fact we are still amazed at what we saw. First of all, the camera with the exposed film in place (to filter most of the visible light) not only saw the light, but it was as bright as pointing the camera to the sun! At this point we realized that both the standard LED's as well as the wide-angle ones work practically the same. You could turn the beacon even 180 degrees (in other words showing the back) and the camera would still see it very brightly.

But then we were in shock. By holding the IR device in our hand we observe something amazing. We could not only see the light going through our hand, we could see every vein as well! very much like x-rays, except we could not see the bones. Again, the surprise was such that I forgot to take pictures of this, but tomorrow I will. We even put the thing inside our mouth, but the cheeks were way to thin for the strength of the light. This immediately brought questions about the safety of this light which we had not considered.

So I have been reading papers and reports by organizations such as The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, but have found little indication of danger at that level. However, although LED's are classified as IR-C are supposed to have a minimal penetration of the skin, while IR-A which is labeled as hazardous is said to penetrate the skin only a few millimeters. So something is odd here. More food for thought.